<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 871 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380143</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that toothbrushes supplied by the appellant for free distribution should be valued under Section 4 of the Central Excise Act, 1944, not Section 4A. The toothbrushes were not intended for retail sale, were not packed with an MRP, and were used by toothpaste manufacturers for free supply. Therefore, the valuation based on transaction value under Section 4 was upheld, setting aside the department&#039;s contention. The appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 May 2019 08:32:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=571167" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 871 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380143</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that toothbrushes supplied by the appellant for free distribution should be valued under Section 4 of the Central Excise Act, 1944, not Section 4A. The toothbrushes were not intended for retail sale, were not packed with an MRP, and were used by toothpaste manufacturers for free supply. Therefore, the valuation based on transaction value under Section 4 was upheld, setting aside the department&#039;s contention. The appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380143</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>