<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 866 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380138</link>
    <description>The court upheld the Value Added Tax Tribunal&#039;s decision to dismiss the appellant&#039;s appeals for failing to comply with the requirement of depositing 25% of the additional tax demand as directed by the Deputy Excise and Taxation Commissioner. The court found the pre-deposit directive reasonable and in accordance with the law, leading to the dismissal of the appeals as the appellant did not fulfill the pre-deposit obligation. The court determined that no question of law necessitated intervention as the Tribunal&#039;s decision was lawful. Applications for condonation of a 6-day delay in filing the appeals were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2019 12:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=571158" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 866 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380138</link>
      <description>The court upheld the Value Added Tax Tribunal&#039;s decision to dismiss the appellant&#039;s appeals for failing to comply with the requirement of depositing 25% of the additional tax demand as directed by the Deputy Excise and Taxation Commissioner. The court found the pre-deposit directive reasonable and in accordance with the law, leading to the dismissal of the appeals as the appellant did not fulfill the pre-deposit obligation. The court determined that no question of law necessitated intervention as the Tribunal&#039;s decision was lawful. Applications for condonation of a 6-day delay in filing the appeals were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380138</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>