<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 865 - TELANGANA AND ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380137</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the order of assessment under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. The petitioner was directed to file a reply and undergo a fresh assessment process. Despite the petitioner&#039;s failure to update their address, they were granted one opportunity to rectify the situation. A payment of Rs. 3,00,000 was required from the petitioner, which was paid. The Assessing Officer was instructed to conduct a personal hearing and issue fresh orders based on the assessment outcome, with provisions for refund if no tax liability was imposed. Any pending miscellaneous petitions were to be dismissed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 May 2019 08:31:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=571156" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 865 - TELANGANA AND ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380137</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the order of assessment under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. The petitioner was directed to file a reply and undergo a fresh assessment process. Despite the petitioner&#039;s failure to update their address, they were granted one opportunity to rectify the situation. A payment of Rs. 3,00,000 was required from the petitioner, which was paid. The Assessing Officer was instructed to conduct a personal hearing and issue fresh orders based on the assessment outcome, with provisions for refund if no tax liability was imposed. Any pending miscellaneous petitions were to be dismissed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380137</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>