https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380133 The court dismissed the writ petition as premature, finding that the petitioner company was given sufficient opportunity to appear before the hearing but failed to do so. The court concluded that the petitioner company neglected attending the hearing and dismissed the petition without costs, allowing the petitioner to attend any future hearing scheduled by the respondent bank. en-us Thu, 02 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 15 May 2019 08:31:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380133 The court dismissed the writ petition as premature, finding that the petitioner company was given sufficient opportunity to appear before the hearing but failed to do so. The court concluded that the petitioner company neglected attending the hearing and dismissed the petition without costs, allowing the petitioner to attend any future hearing scheduled by the respondent bank. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 02 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380133