<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 1296 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280641</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the appellant on allegations of oppression and mismanagement, illegal removal from directorship, non-payment of dividends, and siphoning off funds. It directed fair valuation of the appellant&#039;s shares and provided an exit mechanism. The respondents were prohibited from receiving remuneration until the appellant&#039;s exit was finalized. The order included reinstating the appellant as a director temporarily and allowing potential share purchase at a discounted rate. The Tribunal ensured proper implementation of the order and prohibited future remunerations or alienation of company assets. The appeal was disposed of with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 May 2019 07:26:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=571142" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 1296 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280641</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the appellant on allegations of oppression and mismanagement, illegal removal from directorship, non-payment of dividends, and siphoning off funds. It directed fair valuation of the appellant&#039;s shares and provided an exit mechanism. The respondents were prohibited from receiving remuneration until the appellant&#039;s exit was finalized. The order included reinstating the appellant as a director temporarily and allowing potential share purchase at a discounted rate. The Tribunal ensured proper implementation of the order and prohibited future remunerations or alienation of company assets. The appeal was disposed of with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280641</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>