<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (10) TMI 704 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280636</link>
    <description>A multiplex incentive scheme under the Bombay Entertainment Duty Act limited the proprietor&#039;s duty liability during the concessional period to no duty for the first three years and 25% of the duty leviable for the next two years. The text explains that this concession related to the proprietor&#039;s statutory liability, not the ticket holder&#039;s position, and that printed ticket entries showing a higher duty component did not enlarge the State&#039;s recovery. The demand for full duty and interest was inconsistent with the scheme.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 May 2019 16:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=571126" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (10) TMI 704 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280636</link>
      <description>A multiplex incentive scheme under the Bombay Entertainment Duty Act limited the proprietor&#039;s duty liability during the concessional period to no duty for the first three years and 25% of the duty leviable for the next two years. The text explains that this concession related to the proprietor&#039;s statutory liability, not the ticket holder&#039;s position, and that printed ticket entries showing a higher duty component did not enlarge the State&#039;s recovery. The demand for full duty and interest was inconsistent with the scheme.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280636</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>