https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280632 The Board held that the disputes raised in the company petition, although styled as acts of oppression and mismanagement, are covered by the agreements containing arbitration clauses. The Board emphasized that such disputes must be referred to arbitration as per the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Therefore, the parties were directed to resolve the disputes through arbitration, following precedents like Sukanya Holdings (P) Ltd. v. Jayesh H. Pandey and Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Ltd. v. Verma Transport Co. en-us Tue, 26 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 May 2019 12:16:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280632 The Board held that the disputes raised in the company petition, although styled as acts of oppression and mismanagement, are covered by the agreements containing arbitration clauses. The Board emphasized that such disputes must be referred to arbitration as per the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Therefore, the parties were directed to resolve the disputes through arbitration, following precedents like Sukanya Holdings (P) Ltd. v. Jayesh H. Pandey and Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Ltd. v. Verma Transport Co. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 26 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280632