<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (10) TMI 64 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18110</link>
    <description>The court addressed whether an assessment made after a notice under section 148 of the Income-tax Act constitutes a regular assessment for levying interest under sections 139(8) and 217. Assessments were conducted for certain years, with interest levied and subsequently enhanced by the Assessing Officer. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner reduced the income, leading to a reduction in interest. The Tribunal allowed appeals against the interest levied, emphasizing that assessments under section 147 are not considered regular assessments for interest purposes. The court concluded that interest could not be levied retrospectively and rejected the applications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 17:57:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=57110" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (10) TMI 64 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18110</link>
      <description>The court addressed whether an assessment made after a notice under section 148 of the Income-tax Act constitutes a regular assessment for levying interest under sections 139(8) and 217. Assessments were conducted for certain years, with interest levied and subsequently enhanced by the Assessing Officer. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner reduced the income, leading to a reduction in interest. The Tribunal allowed appeals against the interest levied, emphasizing that assessments under section 147 are not considered regular assessments for interest purposes. The court concluded that interest could not be levied retrospectively and rejected the applications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18110</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>