<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Ocean Freight</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=114963</link>
    <description>The document questions GST treatment on ocean freight for FOB imports where the CHA bills freight separately with GST. It records advice that the CHA should reimburse freight at actuals without markup and that the importer may be liable to pay GST on import of services under the reverse charge mechanism, while others flag potential double taxation and note a judicial stay on IGST levy on ocean freight.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2019 11:33:37 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:55:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=571099" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Ocean Freight</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=114963</link>
      <description>The document questions GST treatment on ocean freight for FOB imports where the CHA bills freight separately with GST. It records advice that the CHA should reimburse freight at actuals without markup and that the importer may be liable to pay GST on import of services under the reverse charge mechanism, while others flag potential double taxation and note a judicial stay on IGST levy on ocean freight.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2019 11:33:37 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=114963</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>