https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18107 The court found that the Central Government failed to comply with statutory obligations regarding the tendering of the consideration amount. The invalid deposit led to the abrogation of the order dated March 31, 1995, under section 269UH(1), resulting in the property being revested in the petitioners. The appropriate authority was directed to issue the necessary declaration and take required steps within six weeks. The writ petition was disposed of with no order as to costs, and interim orders were vacated. en-us Wed, 27 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 26 Sep 2009 17:20:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18107 The court found that the Central Government failed to comply with statutory obligations regarding the tendering of the consideration amount. The invalid deposit led to the abrogation of the order dated March 31, 1995, under section 269UH(1), resulting in the property being revested in the petitioners. The appropriate authority was directed to issue the necessary declaration and take required steps within six weeks. The writ petition was disposed of with no order as to costs, and interim orders were vacated. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 27 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18107