<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 843 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380115</link>
    <description>Receipts from sale of spontaneous growth trees sold to clear land for further cultivation were held to be capital in nature, because the trees were removed as an impediment to cultivation and there was no object or real prospect of regeneration. The Tribunal applied the settled principle that such receipts are not taxable as business income where the sale is incidental to land clearing rather than a profit-making operation. It also held that section 55(2)(a) does not extend to spontaneous growth trees merely because the cost of acquisition is nil, so no capital gains charge arose. The addition was deleted and the lower appellate order was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 May 2019 15:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=571062" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 843 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380115</link>
      <description>Receipts from sale of spontaneous growth trees sold to clear land for further cultivation were held to be capital in nature, because the trees were removed as an impediment to cultivation and there was no object or real prospect of regeneration. The Tribunal applied the settled principle that such receipts are not taxable as business income where the sale is incidental to land clearing rather than a profit-making operation. It also held that section 55(2)(a) does not extend to spontaneous growth trees merely because the cost of acquisition is nil, so no capital gains charge arose. The addition was deleted and the lower appellate order was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380115</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>