<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 837 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380109</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the denial of approval under section 80G(5)(vi) of the Income Tax Act was unjustified based solely on the financial status of the assessee-society and potential misuse concerns. It directed the competent authority to grant approval, with the condition that the society refrains from seeking contributions for admissions. The decision emphasizes the need for a balanced approach in regulatory oversight, requiring concrete evidence and genuine need for approvals, rather than mere suspicions of misuse.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 May 2019 16:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=571053" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 837 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380109</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the denial of approval under section 80G(5)(vi) of the Income Tax Act was unjustified based solely on the financial status of the assessee-society and potential misuse concerns. It directed the competent authority to grant approval, with the condition that the society refrains from seeking contributions for admissions. The decision emphasizes the need for a balanced approach in regulatory oversight, requiring concrete evidence and genuine need for approvals, rather than mere suspicions of misuse.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380109</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>