<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 836 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380108</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the deletion of the addition of share premium made by the Assessing Officer under Sec. 56(2)(viib) of the Income Tax Act. It found the assessee&#039;s use of the discounted cash flow method for share valuation to be consistent with the rules and previous assessment year&#039;s acceptance by the AO. The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing the importance of adhering to prescribed valuation methods and rules, ultimately supporting the decision to delete the share premium addition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 May 2019 15:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=571052" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 836 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380108</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the deletion of the addition of share premium made by the Assessing Officer under Sec. 56(2)(viib) of the Income Tax Act. It found the assessee&#039;s use of the discounted cash flow method for share valuation to be consistent with the rules and previous assessment year&#039;s acceptance by the AO. The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing the importance of adhering to prescribed valuation methods and rules, ultimately supporting the decision to delete the share premium addition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380108</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>