https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380097 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant company, quashing the Registrar of Companies' decision to strike off the company's name. The Tribunal found that the ROC had followed the prescribed procedure and provided sufficient notice to the appellant. Despite initial doubts on the company's operational status, the Tribunal acknowledged the appellant's efforts and investments in setting up a business. Consequently, the Tribunal ordered the restoration of the company's name to protect shareholder interests and investments, subject to specific conditions. The appeal was disposed of with no costs awarded. en-us Mon, 08 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 13 May 2019 14:21:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380097 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant company, quashing the Registrar of Companies' decision to strike off the company's name. The Tribunal found that the ROC had followed the prescribed procedure and provided sufficient notice to the appellant. Despite initial doubts on the company's operational status, the Tribunal acknowledged the appellant's efforts and investments in setting up a business. Consequently, the Tribunal ordered the restoration of the company's name to protect shareholder interests and investments, subject to specific conditions. The appeal was disposed of with no costs awarded. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 08 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380097