<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 823 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380095</link>
    <description>Binding articles of association protected investor participation, board quorum rights, and consent requirements for material encumbrances, so an interim order allowing unilateral creation of charges or liabilities could not properly be modified without a clear prima facie basis, consideration of balance of convenience, and assessment of irreparable prejudice. The pending arbitration-related proceedings reinforced the need to preserve the status quo and protect the subject matter of the company petition. The modification order was therefore unsustainable, and the earlier restraint against creating encumbrances was restored.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 May 2019 07:55:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=571033" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 823 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380095</link>
      <description>Binding articles of association protected investor participation, board quorum rights, and consent requirements for material encumbrances, so an interim order allowing unilateral creation of charges or liabilities could not properly be modified without a clear prima facie basis, consideration of balance of convenience, and assessment of irreparable prejudice. The pending arbitration-related proceedings reinforced the need to preserve the status quo and protect the subject matter of the company petition. The modification order was therefore unsustainable, and the earlier restraint against creating encumbrances was restored.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380095</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>