https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380087 The Tribunal allowed the appeal against the order confirming the attachment of immovable property under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. The appellant, a government servant, successfully argued against the attachment, emphasizing legal amendments and factual grounds. The Tribunal noted the absence of a pending Prosecution Complaint against the appellant and set aside the confirmation order. It advised the appellant to seek remedies in the Special Court where the complaint was pending, recognizing the importance of defending his case properly and limiting the duration of property attachment post-confirmation. en-us Thu, 02 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 May 2019 07:54:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380087 The Tribunal allowed the appeal against the order confirming the attachment of immovable property under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. The appellant, a government servant, successfully argued against the attachment, emphasizing legal amendments and factual grounds. The Tribunal noted the absence of a pending Prosecution Complaint against the appellant and set aside the confirmation order. It advised the appellant to seek remedies in the Special Court where the complaint was pending, recognizing the importance of defending his case properly and limiting the duration of property attachment post-confirmation. Case-Laws Money Laundering Thu, 02 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380087