<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 783 - NATIONAL ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380055</link>
    <description>The judgment concluded that the Respondent had profiteered an amount of Rs. 18,887/- by not passing on the benefit of the GST rate reduction from 28% to 18% on the supply of &quot;luggage trolley bags/suitcases.&quot; The Respondent was directed to reduce prices, deposit the profiteered amount with interest, and face potential penalties for issuing incorrect invoices. The DGAP was tasked with investigating profiteering by the manufacturer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2025 18:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=570911" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 783 - NATIONAL ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380055</link>
      <description>The judgment concluded that the Respondent had profiteered an amount of Rs. 18,887/- by not passing on the benefit of the GST rate reduction from 28% to 18% on the supply of &quot;luggage trolley bags/suitcases.&quot; The Respondent was directed to reduce prices, deposit the profiteered amount with interest, and face potential penalties for issuing incorrect invoices. The DGAP was tasked with investigating profiteering by the manufacturer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380055</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>