https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280593 Section 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure was treated as making a foreign judgment conclusive where a foreign court adjudicates the matter before it and none of the statutory exceptions applies, including lack of competent jurisdiction, absence of merits, denial of applicable law, breach of natural justice, fraud, or illegality. On that basis, the judgment upholding the arbitration award was accepted as binding between the parties. A further declaration that the partnership subsisted was held inconsistent with that conclusive determination and was therefore unavailable, as it would undermine the binding effect of the foreign judgment and serve no useful purpose. en-us Wed, 02 Jul 1947 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 11 May 2019 13:56:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280593 Section 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure was treated as making a foreign judgment conclusive where a foreign court adjudicates the matter before it and none of the statutory exceptions applies, including lack of competent jurisdiction, absence of merits, denial of applicable law, breach of natural justice, fraud, or illegality. On that basis, the judgment upholding the arbitration award was accepted as binding between the parties. A further declaration that the partnership subsisted was held inconsistent with that conclusive determination and was therefore unavailable, as it would undermine the binding effect of the foreign judgment and serve no useful purpose. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 02 Jul 1947 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280593