<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Extended Limitation Period Applies, One-Year Demand Argument Unsupported by Appellant&#039;s Counsel.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=46447</link>
    <description>Extended period of limitation - there are no basis for the argument of the learned counsel for the appellant that the demand must be raised within one year from the date on which the department comes to know of the alleged clandestine removal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 11 May 2019 07:53:52 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 May 2019 07:53:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=570809" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Extended Limitation Period Applies, One-Year Demand Argument Unsupported by Appellant&#039;s Counsel.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=46447</link>
      <description>Extended period of limitation - there are no basis for the argument of the learned counsel for the appellant that the demand must be raised within one year from the date on which the department comes to know of the alleged clandestine removal.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 May 2019 07:53:52 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=46447</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>