<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>AO&#039;s Enquiry Validates, CIT&#039;s Section 263 Re-evaluation Blocked Due to Prior Application of Mind.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=46440</link>
    <description>Revision u/s 263 - AO actually carried out an enquiry after the reopening of the proceedings and that once there was an application of mind, on the part of the AO, it was not open to the Commissioner to invoke the jurisdiction u/s 263 - CIT by invoking Section 263 only attempted to re-appreciate the facts which is not permissible</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 11 May 2019 07:28:20 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 May 2019 07:28:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=570803" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>AO&#039;s Enquiry Validates, CIT&#039;s Section 263 Re-evaluation Blocked Due to Prior Application of Mind.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=46440</link>
      <description>Revision u/s 263 - AO actually carried out an enquiry after the reopening of the proceedings and that once there was an application of mind, on the part of the AO, it was not open to the Commissioner to invoke the jurisdiction u/s 263 - CIT by invoking Section 263 only attempted to re-appreciate the facts which is not permissible</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 May 2019 07:28:20 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=46440</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>