<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 734 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380006</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the tax demand under sections 206C(1) and 206C(7), emphasizing the assessee&#039;s compliance with legal requirements and buyer declarations for tax exemption on sales. The judgment underscored the significance of timely form submission and judicial interpretations in interpreting tax collection provisions, ultimately rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 May 2019 14:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=570775" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 734 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380006</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the tax demand under sections 206C(1) and 206C(7), emphasizing the assessee&#039;s compliance with legal requirements and buyer declarations for tax exemption on sales. The judgment underscored the significance of timely form submission and judicial interpretations in interpreting tax collection provisions, ultimately rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380006</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>