<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 727 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379999</link>
    <description>Delay in filing the special leave petition was condoned, enabling the Court to proceed to the merits. The petition was then dismissed by applying the earlier decision in Commissioner vs. Mahindra and Mahindra Limited, with the Court declining to entertain fresh argument and following the operative conclusion of that controlling authority. No new legal principle was laid down in the order, and the pending applications were disposed of along with the dismissal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 13:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=570765" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 727 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379999</link>
      <description>Delay in filing the special leave petition was condoned, enabling the Court to proceed to the merits. The petition was then dismissed by applying the earlier decision in Commissioner vs. Mahindra and Mahindra Limited, with the Court declining to entertain fresh argument and following the operative conclusion of that controlling authority. No new legal principle was laid down in the order, and the pending applications were disposed of along with the dismissal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379999</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>