<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 722 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379994</link>
    <description>The Tribunal consistently ruled in favor of appellants whose refund claims were rejected based on time limitations, emphasizing the importance of meeting conditions under the relevant notifications and statutory provisions. The judgments highlighted the need to consider the date of sale of goods for determining the refund claim&#039;s timeliness, ultimately allowing the appeals and granting refunds with interest.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 May 2019 07:18:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=570760" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 722 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379994</link>
      <description>The Tribunal consistently ruled in favor of appellants whose refund claims were rejected based on time limitations, emphasizing the importance of meeting conditions under the relevant notifications and statutory provisions. The judgments highlighted the need to consider the date of sale of goods for determining the refund claim&#039;s timeliness, ultimately allowing the appeals and granting refunds with interest.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379994</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>