<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 1185 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280583</link>
    <description>Where the statutory appellate tribunal had not yet been constituted, the High Court granted interim protection against recovery proceedings pending the petitioner&#039;s appeal. It directed that, if the petitioner furnished the security contemplated by the Haryana Value Added Tax Act within the specified time, recovery would not be initiated. The respondents were required to decide whether the offered security was satisfactory, and if they rejected it, recovery would remain stayed for one further week. The petitioner was also restrained from disposing of or encumbering its immovable properties during the pendency of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 May 2019 07:18:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=570753" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 1185 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280583</link>
      <description>Where the statutory appellate tribunal had not yet been constituted, the High Court granted interim protection against recovery proceedings pending the petitioner&#039;s appeal. It directed that, if the petitioner furnished the security contemplated by the Haryana Value Added Tax Act within the specified time, recovery would not be initiated. The respondents were required to decide whether the offered security was satisfactory, and if they rejected it, recovery would remain stayed for one further week. The petitioner was also restrained from disposing of or encumbering its immovable properties during the pendency of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280583</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>