https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280581 The High Court directed the competent officer to first determine whether the security offered by the petitioner under the Haryana Value Added Tax Act, 2003 was adequate, after the petitioner said the offer had not been examined. Because the appeal could not proceed as the Tribunal had not been constituted, and the respondents stated that recovery would not be initiated if proper security was furnished, the Court restrained recovery under the order dated 22.12.2014 until that decision was made and for one week thereafter. The writ petition was accordingly disposed of with interim protection pending the respondents' decision on the offered security. en-us Wed, 04 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 11 May 2019 07:18:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280581 The High Court directed the competent officer to first determine whether the security offered by the petitioner under the Haryana Value Added Tax Act, 2003 was adequate, after the petitioner said the offer had not been examined. Because the appeal could not proceed as the Tribunal had not been constituted, and the respondents stated that recovery would not be initiated if proper security was furnished, the Court restrained recovery under the order dated 22.12.2014 until that decision was made and for one week thereafter. The writ petition was accordingly disposed of with interim protection pending the respondents' decision on the offered security. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 04 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280581