<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 1968 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280580</link>
    <description>Substituted service by paper publication was permitted where repeated attempts to serve notice on the corporate debtor at the MCA-registered address had failed. The Tribunal treated its inherent procedural powers under Rule 11 of the NCLT Rules, 2016 as sufficient to authorise service through widely circulated English and Kannada newspapers, and granted permission accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 May 2019 07:18:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=570750" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 1968 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280580</link>
      <description>Substituted service by paper publication was permitted where repeated attempts to serve notice on the corporate debtor at the MCA-registered address had failed. The Tribunal treated its inherent procedural powers under Rule 11 of the NCLT Rules, 2016 as sufficient to authorise service through widely circulated English and Kannada newspapers, and granted permission accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280580</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>