https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280585 At the quashing stage, a complaint need only disclose a prima facie case on its face; allegations of mental cruelty were treated as capable of falling within the scope of cruelty, and averments of entrustment or unlawful retention of property were sufficient to support criminal breach of trust charges, so the proceedings were not quashed. For enforcement of a maintenance order, the Court held that Article 32 was not the proper remedy where the Code provided an execution mechanism and the statutory process had already been invoked, so the writ was declined and the pending proceedings were directed to be taken up expeditiously. en-us Tue, 18 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 11 May 2019 07:18:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280585 At the quashing stage, a complaint need only disclose a prima facie case on its face; allegations of mental cruelty were treated as capable of falling within the scope of cruelty, and averments of entrustment or unlawful retention of property were sufficient to support criminal breach of trust charges, so the proceedings were not quashed. For enforcement of a maintenance order, the Court held that Article 32 was not the proper remedy where the Code provided an execution mechanism and the statutory process had already been invoked, so the writ was declined and the pending proceedings were directed to be taken up expeditiously. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 18 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280585