https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280588 Section 134 of the Trade Marks Act permits a trade mark infringement suit to be instituted where the plaintiff resides or carries on business. On the plaint averments, the plaintiff had an office at Bhopal and the alleged infringement was stated to have occurred at Rajpur in Madhya Pradesh, so the Bangalore court was held competent to determine the matter in accordance with law. The territorial jurisdiction objection was rejected, and the appeal was allowed. en-us Fri, 18 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 11 May 2019 07:18:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280588 Section 134 of the Trade Marks Act permits a trade mark infringement suit to be instituted where the plaintiff resides or carries on business. On the plaint averments, the plaintiff had an office at Bhopal and the alleged infringement was stated to have occurred at Rajpur in Madhya Pradesh, so the Bangalore court was held competent to determine the matter in accordance with law. The territorial jurisdiction objection was rejected, and the appeal was allowed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 18 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280588