https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379985 The tribunal upheld the impugned order, confirming allegations of clandestine removal by M/s Sanghi Polymers Pvt Ltd (SPPL) and imposing a penalty on M/s Victor Hitech (VH) as recipients of the goods. The evidence, primarily from transport documents and test reports, was deemed adequate. The tribunal also ruled that the demand was raised within the permissible period under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act. As a result, the appeals were rejected, and the impugned order was affirmed. en-us Thu, 09 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 11 May 2019 07:17:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379985 The tribunal upheld the impugned order, confirming allegations of clandestine removal by M/s Sanghi Polymers Pvt Ltd (SPPL) and imposing a penalty on M/s Victor Hitech (VH) as recipients of the goods. The evidence, primarily from transport documents and test reports, was deemed adequate. The tribunal also ruled that the demand was raised within the permissible period under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act. As a result, the appeals were rejected, and the impugned order was affirmed. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 09 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379985