https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280564 Revisionary interference with an acquittal is confined to cases showing a grave failure of justice. The text contrasts two competing views of the evidence: one treated the magistrate's approach as vitiated by misconceptions about the land and the lessee's right to impound cattle, while the other treated the cattle seizure as illegal coercion to recover rent and held that resistance could not sustain the rioting conviction. On either view, the record did not justify the court's discretionary intervention. The acquittal was therefore left undisturbed and the revision was discharged. en-us Fri, 29 Jun 1917 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 10 May 2019 16:36:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280564 Revisionary interference with an acquittal is confined to cases showing a grave failure of justice. The text contrasts two competing views of the evidence: one treated the magistrate's approach as vitiated by misconceptions about the land and the lessee's right to impound cattle, while the other treated the cattle seizure as illegal coercion to recover rent and held that resistance could not sustain the rioting conviction. On either view, the record did not justify the court's discretionary intervention. The acquittal was therefore left undisturbed and the revision was discharged. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 29 Jun 1917 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280564