<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 1784 - SUPREME COURT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280558</link>
    <description>Abetment of suicide under Section 306 IPC requires instigation, conspiracy or intentional aid, supported by clear mens rea and a proximate link to the suicide; vague allegations or ordinary domestic discord are insufficient. On the materials described, there was no specific allegation of cruelty, dowry harassment or any positive act by the appellants to provoke or assist the deceased, and the incident relied on was an isolated domestic episode. As the uncontroverted allegations did not disclose the offence and continuation of the prosecution would amount to abuse of process, the proceedings were liable to be quashed under Section 482 CrPC.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 May 2019 15:44:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=570683" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 1784 - SUPREME COURT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280558</link>
      <description>Abetment of suicide under Section 306 IPC requires instigation, conspiracy or intentional aid, supported by clear mens rea and a proximate link to the suicide; vague allegations or ordinary domestic discord are insufficient. On the materials described, there was no specific allegation of cruelty, dowry harassment or any positive act by the appellants to provoke or assist the deceased, and the incident relied on was an isolated domestic episode. As the uncontroverted allegations did not disclose the offence and continuation of the prosecution would amount to abuse of process, the proceedings were liable to be quashed under Section 482 CrPC.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280558</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>