https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280556 A complaint alleging dishonest diversion of trust property under mutual wills and reciprocal trusts was treated as disclosing a prima facie case of criminal breach of trust, cheating and conspiracy. At the quashing stage, the Court held that disputed questions on trust obligations, vesting, revocation and the accused's role required evidence and could not be finally tested. It also held that the existence of civil remedies or civil dimensions did not by itself negate criminal liability, and alleged mala fides could not justify summary termination at the threshold. The proceedings were therefore allowed to continue under the inherent jurisdiction standard. en-us Fri, 03 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 10 May 2019 15:25:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280556 A complaint alleging dishonest diversion of trust property under mutual wills and reciprocal trusts was treated as disclosing a prima facie case of criminal breach of trust, cheating and conspiracy. At the quashing stage, the Court held that disputed questions on trust obligations, vesting, revocation and the accused's role required evidence and could not be finally tested. It also held that the existence of civil remedies or civil dimensions did not by itself negate criminal liability, and alleged mala fides could not justify summary termination at the threshold. The proceedings were therefore allowed to continue under the inherent jurisdiction standard. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 03 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280556