<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (6) TMI 55 - PATNA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18065</link>
    <description>The court declined to provide opinions on the issues regarding the deduction of expenses incurred in forest regeneration and the exclusion of expenses on royalty payment. The disputes were considered resolved through subsequent developments and agreements between the parties. Consequently, the court returned the references for fresh assessments, considering the academic importance of the disputes in light of the resolved matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 15:25:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=57065" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (6) TMI 55 - PATNA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18065</link>
      <description>The court declined to provide opinions on the issues regarding the deduction of expenses incurred in forest regeneration and the exclusion of expenses on royalty payment. The disputes were considered resolved through subsequent developments and agreements between the parties. Consequently, the court returned the references for fresh assessments, considering the academic importance of the disputes in light of the resolved matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18065</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>