<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (11) TMI 63 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18062</link>
    <description>The court affirmed that Smt. Oolia Kulsum was the sole beneficiary with a determinate interest under the trust deed, leading to the assets being taxable under section 21(1) of the Wealth-tax Act for the assessment year 1979-80. The court upheld the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision, emphasizing that Smt. Oolia Kulsum&#039;s interest was specific and not indeterminate, thus dismissing the Revenue&#039;s challenge and concluding no referable question of law arose.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 15:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=57062" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (11) TMI 63 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18062</link>
      <description>The court affirmed that Smt. Oolia Kulsum was the sole beneficiary with a determinate interest under the trust deed, leading to the assets being taxable under section 21(1) of the Wealth-tax Act for the assessment year 1979-80. The court upheld the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision, emphasizing that Smt. Oolia Kulsum&#039;s interest was specific and not indeterminate, thus dismissing the Revenue&#039;s challenge and concluding no referable question of law arose.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18062</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>