<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 694 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379966</link>
    <description>The Bombay HC dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal on transfer pricing adjustments for both issues. The ITAT&#039;s decisions were upheld, affirming the necessity of aggregating AE and non-AE transactions for ALP determination and emphasizing region-specific comparisons. The CIT (A) and ITAT&#039;s judgments were found consistent with the Income Tax Act provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Feb 2024 15:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=570617" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 694 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379966</link>
      <description>The Bombay HC dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal on transfer pricing adjustments for both issues. The ITAT&#039;s decisions were upheld, affirming the necessity of aggregating AE and non-AE transactions for ALP determination and emphasizing region-specific comparisons. The CIT (A) and ITAT&#039;s judgments were found consistent with the Income Tax Act provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379966</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>