<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (11) TMI 62 - PATNA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18061</link>
    <description>Prosecution under section 276C of the Income-tax Act was held unsustainable after the appellate tribunal deleted the addition forming its sole foundation. With the alleged concealed income addition no longer surviving and the Revenue not disputing that position, the criminal proceedings were treated as having lost their basis. Continuation of the prosecution was found to serve no useful purpose and to amount to abuse of the process of court, so the prosecution was quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Nov 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 14:26:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=57061" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (11) TMI 62 - PATNA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18061</link>
      <description>Prosecution under section 276C of the Income-tax Act was held unsustainable after the appellate tribunal deleted the addition forming its sole foundation. With the alleged concealed income addition no longer surviving and the Revenue not disputing that position, the criminal proceedings were treated as having lost their basis. Continuation of the prosecution was found to serve no useful purpose and to amount to abuse of the process of court, so the prosecution was quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Nov 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18061</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>