https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379946 Complaint proceedings under the Customs Act were not quashed because the dispute involved contested questions about seizure of gold bars, claimed ownership, and the effect of a statement recorded under Section 108, together with the absence of a valid explanation to notices. As the matter required determination by the competent authority, the HC declined to interfere at that stage. The applicant was given six weeks to appear before the authority or court concerned and seek appropriate relief, and no coercive action was directed during that period. en-us Fri, 03 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 May 2019 18:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379946 Complaint proceedings under the Customs Act were not quashed because the dispute involved contested questions about seizure of gold bars, claimed ownership, and the effect of a statement recorded under Section 108, together with the absence of a valid explanation to notices. As the matter required determination by the competent authority, the HC declined to interfere at that stage. The applicant was given six weeks to appear before the authority or court concerned and seek appropriate relief, and no coercive action was directed during that period. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 03 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379946