<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (5) TMI 53 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18059</link>
    <description>The High Court held that for deductions under sections 80HH and 80J, profits must directly stem from industrial activities. The Court rejected the Commissioner&#039;s corrective notice due to insufficient evidence. Relying on legal precedents, the Tribunal emphasized the need for a clear link between profits and industrial operations. The judgment favored the Revenue, requiring the case to be reviewed by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Cochin Bench.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 May 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 14:22:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=57059" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (5) TMI 53 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18059</link>
      <description>The High Court held that for deductions under sections 80HH and 80J, profits must directly stem from industrial activities. The Court rejected the Commissioner&#039;s corrective notice due to insufficient evidence. Relying on legal precedents, the Tribunal emphasized the need for a clear link between profits and industrial operations. The judgment favored the Revenue, requiring the case to be reviewed by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Cochin Bench.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 May 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18059</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>