<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 668 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379940</link>
    <description>Condonation of delay in seeking restoration requires a satisfactory explanation showing sufficient cause; unexplained inaction, failure to cure office objections, and repeated delayed motions defeated condonation. On the facts, the Department&#039;s prolonged negligence in prosecuting the appeal, coupled with an unjustified attempt to blame counsel despite correspondence showing that only expenses were sought, meant restoration was not warranted. The delay was refused to be condoned and the appeal was not restored, leaving the dismissal for non-prosecution undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2019 12:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=570582" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 668 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379940</link>
      <description>Condonation of delay in seeking restoration requires a satisfactory explanation showing sufficient cause; unexplained inaction, failure to cure office objections, and repeated delayed motions defeated condonation. On the facts, the Department&#039;s prolonged negligence in prosecuting the appeal, coupled with an unjustified attempt to blame counsel despite correspondence showing that only expenses were sought, meant restoration was not warranted. The delay was refused to be condoned and the appeal was not restored, leaving the dismissal for non-prosecution undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379940</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>