<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 656 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379928</link>
    <description>The High Court concluded that the appeals regarding the valuation of goods, applicability of certain rules, and imposition of penalties under the Central Excise Act were not maintainable before it but should be filed under Section 35L before the Supreme Court. The court directed the Registry to return the tribunal&#039;s orders to the appellants&#039; counsel for further action. All appeals were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 May 2019 07:50:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=570555" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 656 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379928</link>
      <description>The High Court concluded that the appeals regarding the valuation of goods, applicability of certain rules, and imposition of penalties under the Central Excise Act were not maintainable before it but should be filed under Section 35L before the Supreme Court. The court directed the Registry to return the tribunal&#039;s orders to the appellants&#039; counsel for further action. All appeals were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379928</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>