<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 655 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379927</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the search conducted by DGGSTI at the petitioner&#039;s premises, holding it was justified and within jurisdiction. Procedural irregularities did not invalidate the search, and the seized documents were deemed relevant to the investigation. The court found no merit in allegations of malafide intent and arbitrariness, ultimately upholding the legality of the search and the actions of the officers involved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2019 13:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=570552" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 655 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379927</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the search conducted by DGGSTI at the petitioner&#039;s premises, holding it was justified and within jurisdiction. Procedural irregularities did not invalidate the search, and the seized documents were deemed relevant to the investigation. The court found no merit in allegations of malafide intent and arbitrariness, ultimately upholding the legality of the search and the actions of the officers involved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379927</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>