https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280540 An executing court cannot go beyond the decree under execution and may not add interest that was not awarded in the decree itself. The settled rule applied was that execution must remain confined to the terms of the decree as drawn, so earlier authorities did not justify enlarging the relief by granting interest. The prior order deleting such interest was therefore consistent with the binding legal position. A request to recall or review that order was also rejected, as the applicant had already been heard on merits and no basis was found to reopen the concluded decision. en-us Fri, 22 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 May 2019 17:56:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280540 An executing court cannot go beyond the decree under execution and may not add interest that was not awarded in the decree itself. The settled rule applied was that execution must remain confined to the terms of the decree as drawn, so earlier authorities did not justify enlarging the relief by granting interest. The prior order deleting such interest was therefore consistent with the binding legal position. A request to recall or review that order was also rejected, as the applicant had already been heard on merits and no basis was found to reopen the concluded decision. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 22 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280540