https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379912 The High Court set aside the Settlement Commission's order refusing to extend the due date for passing orders within eighteen months. The Court held that the time taken by the petitioners in pursuing remedies before the court should be excluded when calculating the 18-month period under the Income Tax Act. The Court directed the Settlement Commission to expedite the decision-making process and not wait for the full 18 months to pass. The petitions were allowed, and the excluded period was determined, with no costs ordered. en-us Tue, 07 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 05 Jun 2019 14:25:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379912 The High Court set aside the Settlement Commission's order refusing to extend the due date for passing orders within eighteen months. The Court held that the time taken by the petitioners in pursuing remedies before the court should be excluded when calculating the 18-month period under the Income Tax Act. The Court directed the Settlement Commission to expedite the decision-making process and not wait for the full 18 months to pass. The petitions were allowed, and the excluded period was determined, with no costs ordered. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 07 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379912