<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Reconsiders Decision on Constitutional Validity of Section 234E, Questions &#039;Fee&#039; vs &#039;Penalty&#039; Distinction in Income Tax.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=46395</link>
    <description>Constitutional validity of Section 234E - Court recalled its earlier order upholding validity - Section 234E though uses the word ‘fee’ but, it is in fact in the nature of penalty - applying the law in relation to the distinction between a ‘tax’ and a ‘fee’ alone will not be apposite in testing the validity</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2019 06:31:18 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 May 2019 06:31:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=570452" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Reconsiders Decision on Constitutional Validity of Section 234E, Questions &#039;Fee&#039; vs &#039;Penalty&#039; Distinction in Income Tax.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=46395</link>
      <description>Constitutional validity of Section 234E - Court recalled its earlier order upholding validity - Section 234E though uses the word ‘fee’ but, it is in fact in the nature of penalty - applying the law in relation to the distinction between a ‘tax’ and a ‘fee’ alone will not be apposite in testing the validity</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2019 06:31:18 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=46395</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>