<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 611 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379883</link>
    <description>The case involved confiscation of duty-free raw material, duty confirmation, penalty imposition on companies, confiscation and redemption of export consignments, penalty imposition on individuals and Clearing House Agents, jurisdictional issues, legal arguments, and consideration of evidence and findings. The Commissioner ordered confiscation of raw material, confirmed duty and imposed penalties on companies, and confiscated export consignments with redemption options. Significant penalties were imposed on individuals and CHAs. Jurisdictional issues were addressed, legal arguments considered, and evidence findings upheld penalties and confiscations, emphasizing the seriousness of economic offenses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 May 2019 06:28:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=570413" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 611 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379883</link>
      <description>The case involved confiscation of duty-free raw material, duty confirmation, penalty imposition on companies, confiscation and redemption of export consignments, penalty imposition on individuals and Clearing House Agents, jurisdictional issues, legal arguments, and consideration of evidence and findings. The Commissioner ordered confiscation of raw material, confirmed duty and imposed penalties on companies, and confiscated export consignments with redemption options. Significant penalties were imposed on individuals and CHAs. Jurisdictional issues were addressed, legal arguments considered, and evidence findings upheld penalties and confiscations, emphasizing the seriousness of economic offenses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379883</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>