<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 610 - SUPREME COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379882</link>
    <description>The Civil Appeal was dismissed on account of the low tax effect involved, and the Court left all questions of law open. Delay in filing was condoned, but the order did not decide the merits of the customs controversy or determine any substantive legal issue beyond the disposal of the appeal for want of sufficient tax consequence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 May 2019 06:28:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=570412" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 610 - SUPREME COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379882</link>
      <description>The Civil Appeal was dismissed on account of the low tax effect involved, and the Court left all questions of law open. Delay in filing was condoned, but the order did not decide the merits of the customs controversy or determine any substantive legal issue beyond the disposal of the appeal for want of sufficient tax consequence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379882</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>