<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 609 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379881</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the validity of the Order granting leave under Section 446 of the Companies Act, 1956, post the enactment of the Companies Act, 2013. It concluded that the Order remains valid as it was issued before the new Act came into force, and the Company Petition is considered a &#039;saved Petition&#039; falling under the jurisdiction of the High Court. The Court dismissed the Applicant&#039;s contentions regarding the doctrine of estoppel, jurisdiction under Section 430 of the Companies Act, 2013, and the retrospective application of Section 430. The Application was ultimately dismissed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2019 10:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=570410" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 609 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379881</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the validity of the Order granting leave under Section 446 of the Companies Act, 1956, post the enactment of the Companies Act, 2013. It concluded that the Order remains valid as it was issued before the new Act came into force, and the Company Petition is considered a &#039;saved Petition&#039; falling under the jurisdiction of the High Court. The Court dismissed the Applicant&#039;s contentions regarding the doctrine of estoppel, jurisdiction under Section 430 of the Companies Act, 2013, and the retrospective application of Section 430. The Application was ultimately dismissed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379881</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>