<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 608 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379880</link>
    <description>Article 23A of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 provides a self-contained regime for stamp duty on amalgamation, merger, reconstruction, or demerger. The opening reference to conveyance does not displace the specific rates and limiting conditions in sub-clauses (a) and (b), and the phrase &quot;whichever is higher&quot; applies only within the alternatives stated in the relevant sub-clause. Where the transferor company holds no immovable property in West Bengal, duty is computed on the aggregate consideration paid by the transferee company at the rate specifically prescribed in Article 23A, not at the general conveyance rate under Article 23. The higher demand based on Article 23 was held unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2019 11:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=570407" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 608 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379880</link>
      <description>Article 23A of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 provides a self-contained regime for stamp duty on amalgamation, merger, reconstruction, or demerger. The opening reference to conveyance does not displace the specific rates and limiting conditions in sub-clauses (a) and (b), and the phrase &quot;whichever is higher&quot; applies only within the alternatives stated in the relevant sub-clause. Where the transferor company holds no immovable property in West Bengal, duty is computed on the aggregate consideration paid by the transferee company at the rate specifically prescribed in Article 23A, not at the general conveyance rate under Article 23. The higher demand based on Article 23 was held unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379880</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>