https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379875 The Tribunal held that the Company Petition was maintainable despite the Arbitration Application, as certain issues fell under the exclusive jurisdiction of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT). It was determined that the acts complained of in the petition could not be adjudicated by the sole arbitrator, as they involved statutory rights and obligations under the Companies Act. The Tribunal found that the petition was not a dressed-up suit and dismissed the Miscellaneous Application. The respondent was directed to file a reply, and the matter was scheduled for final hearing. en-us Fri, 31 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 May 2019 15:41:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379875 The Tribunal held that the Company Petition was maintainable despite the Arbitration Application, as certain issues fell under the exclusive jurisdiction of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT). It was determined that the acts complained of in the petition could not be adjudicated by the sole arbitrator, as they involved statutory rights and obligations under the Companies Act. The Tribunal found that the petition was not a dressed-up suit and dismissed the Miscellaneous Application. The respondent was directed to file a reply, and the matter was scheduled for final hearing. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 31 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379875