<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (11) TMI 24 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18039</link>
    <description>The court held that the nature of the capital asset (short-term or long-term) must be determined based on the law in force on the date of transfer. The Tribunal was justified in treating the plots as long-term capital assets, and the gains should be taxed accordingly. The court answered the question in the affirmative, in favor of the assessee and against the Revenue, with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 13:20:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=57039" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (11) TMI 24 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18039</link>
      <description>The court held that the nature of the capital asset (short-term or long-term) must be determined based on the law in force on the date of transfer. The Tribunal was justified in treating the plots as long-term capital assets, and the gains should be taxed accordingly. The court answered the question in the affirmative, in favor of the assessee and against the Revenue, with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18039</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>